If you want a fee reduced or removed, you can call your processor and just ask. Most of the time they say yes. Why would they not? You checked a box on your to do list, you feel like you won, and the matter is now in your rearview mirror.
This was probably your first rodeo. It was their ten thousandth. They do this all day, every day, and they have for years. There is a reason these companies make billions, and it is not that they roll over when a merchant calls.
Say you spot a bogus line item. An “Interchange Clearing Fee,” costing you 0.15%, like this one.
You call. They say “no problem” and take it off. Everyone is happy.
Fast forward a few months. Now there is a “Settlement Funding Fee” on the statement instead.
Same 0.15%. Different name. And this one has been sitting there for a couple of months already, which changes the conversation entirely.
Maybe they remove it again to keep you calm, and try again next month. Maybe they tell you this one cannot be removed. Or they point you back at your merchant agreement and say, read page one.
It says they can increase your fees, and add new ones, for any reason.
Read that slowly. Not for a cost increase they can point to. Not when the card networks change something. For any reason.
Then it gets worse, because of the clause underneath it.
By continuing to use the account after thirty days, you have agreed. The new fee is no longer something they did to you. It is something you accepted, and it is now part of the agreement going forward.
Two things happen when that window closes, and the second one is the expensive one.
The first is that you lose the money already taken. That is annoying, and on a small fee it is survivable.
The second is that the fee is now baked in. It keeps charging every month, on every batch, for as long as you stay. A fee of 0.15% sounds trivial until you run it against a year of volume, and it does not stop on its own. Nobody at the processor is going to call and remind you it is there.
This is also why the “we removed it, no problem” call is less of a win than it feels. Removing one fee does nothing to the clause that let them add it. The clause is still there, and so is the next fee.
You do not need to understand every line to catch the changes. You need to notice what is different from last month.
If you want the longer version of how the pricing is built in the first place, and why some of these names sound official when they are invented, read credit card processing fees explained.
A one time audit finds what is on the statement today. It does not stop what lands on the statement next quarter, and the clause on page one guarantees something eventually will.
Monthly monitoring exists because the thirty day window is the only leverage the agreement gives you, and it only works if somebody is actually watching. We catch the overbillings, get the money returned, and make sure you are not quietly signed up to a worse deal going forward.
Get Your Free Audit | Schedule A Free Consultation
Subscribe to insights | Read more Insights | Submit an article idea
Read More Check out our other insights here
If Bank of America handles your credit card processing, go and pull your last three statements before you read any further. We have watched accounts at that bank move from four basis points to over forty, and the businesses paying it were told the new
Do you have a “Risk Fee” on your credit card processing statement?
No? Good. You are luckier than a lot of merchants, and you should keep reading anyway.
